Across the Atlantic

Felicity Duncan|

24 February 2010 11:15

Tea parties and social unrest

Article tools

Print article
Send to friend

Just how scary is the US Tea Party movement?

PHILADELPHIA - Over the last few weeks, a ragtag social movement dubbed the Tea Party Movement (TPM), which has been coalescing countrywide around issues like taxation, bank bailouts and the growing role of government in the economy, has come to great prominence in US media.

A major, front-page story in the New York Times last week underscored the growing importance of this grassroots movement, which emerged on the scene last year with a series of anti-tax demonstrations. The movement - although it's perhaps too decentralised and amorphous to call a ‘movement' - is essentially a response from Americans who are reeling over the brutal impact of the Great Recession, and who have serious doubts about the government's plans to ameliorate it. It's just one response, of course, but it has several aspects to it that make it a rather alarming one.

Brief background on the TPM
The name "tea party" is a reference to the Boston Tea Party, a 1773 protest against imperial Britain in which disgruntled Bostonians threw chests of tea into the Boston Harbour to demonstrate their anger at what they saw as unfair taxation (obviously the story was a lot more complex than this, but that's the gist of it.)

The TPM, as noted, got its start through a series of tax protests that kicked off in April 2009, hence the association with the Boston Tea Party. Americans were worried that the massive increases in public spending that the government authorised in response to the recession were going to result in higher tax rates, something that Americans are highly allergic to. The movement was nurtured by extensive coverage by Fox News (especially Glen Beck) and by conservative talk radio hosts like Rush Limbaugh.

The movement also made great use of social networking tools like Twitter and Facebook, blogging, and it conducted an e-mail campaign with the unfortunate name of "tea bagging" (if you don't know the slang meaning for the term, check out Urban Dictionary's take on it).

From those beginnings, it has grown into a much wider phenomenon, with a number of small, local organisations signing on to the TPM bandwagon, as well as several larger, more structured national and regional institutions.

Tea Party ideas
Generalising about the TPM is tricky given the fact that the movement is dispersed, decentralised, and made up of many different organisations and groups. By way of illustration, a Google search for the term "tea party movement" turns up dozens of sites claiming to be the official site of the movement, including the Tea Party Patriots and Tax Day Tea Party, and many other sites that discuss various strains of Tea Party ideology like http://www.resistnet.com/, http://www.wnd.com/ and http://www.infowars.com/.

Although it's tough to make sweeping statements, there are however some unifying ideas underlying the movement.

The Boston Tea Party is widely seen as a shining example of ordinary Americans refusing to submit to unfair policies, even when those policies were being enforced by some local rulers. It's symbolic of a rich vein of American thought and protest that holds that the only guard a country has against tyranny is the actions of ordinary people, and more importantly, that ordinary Americans have a moral right, even an obligation, to break the law when the law is tyrannical.

This all goes back to the Declaration of Independence, which says "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness; That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed; That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness."

In other words, people have a right to overthrow their government if that government is doing things that will abridge their rights to "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness."

This idea is very important to Tea Party types, as is illustrated by one of the darker aspects of the movement: its cosy relationship with a number of right-wing militias. America has a long history of non-governmental militias (see the Michigan Militia, A Well Regulated Militia, and Oath Keepers for some examples of these groups and their rhetoric), and some elements of the TPM are aligning with these para-military groups, talking about armed struggle against the government and the need to violently overthrow the Obama regime.

In an interesting document, the Department of Homeland Security acknowledged this issue, warning that "The economic downturn and the election of the first African-American president present unique drivers for rightwing radicalisation and recruitment." And sure enough, TPM adherents with no history of radical politics are increasing being drawn in to the darker side of these right-wing groups.

In the past, terrorist attacks in the US have been carried out by right-wing extremists. In 1995, for example, Oklahoma City was bombed by right wingers, and just this month, Joseph Stack crashed his airplane into an Internal Revenue Service building (see Newsweek article on right-wing terrorism).

So perhaps the main reason to pay attention to the TPM is its potential for violence, its violent rhetoric and the danger that radicalised right-wing ideology poses. America is in a tough place. In many ways, it's a great power in decline. Its status as sole superpower is being challenged by the emergence of China, while its sense of safety is under threat from radical Islam. Economically, it's experiencing its bleakest times and worst unemployment since the Great Depression, and politically it seems paralysed (see previous column and this week's Economist cover story).

In short, conditions are ripe for fundamentalist ideology (like the TPM's emphasis on the founding documents of the US and constitutional purity), social instability and even violence, which could further weaken American economic prospects and political functioning. That's a pretty dour cup of tea.

Write to Felicity Duncan: felicity@moneyweb.co.za or follow her on Twitter at http://twitter.com/FelicityDuncan

COMMENTS

 
 responses to this article

Oh phuque
I thought the tea party movement was an intiative by Her grand-maternal excellency Winnie (diamond-smuggler) mandela to instill some elements of pedi culture into the otherwise dull, drab and breitling-less shack dwellers of caster semenyiville . .more

by Julius mal-enema on February 24 2010, 12:34
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Viva Hugo! Viva Osama!
For too long, the world has been subjected to the radical ideas hatched by liberal a**sholes on the US east coast, for example that one-man-takes-all democracy is the only viable model.

As South Africa as well as Afghanistan have . .more

by Hugo Chavez on February 24 2010, 13:12
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

"A RAG TAG SOCIAL MOVEMENT" NO THEY AINT FELICITY!
The tea party movement is a vibrant right wing tendency that wants some real CHANGE and not the Wall Street C*** that Obama dishes out.
I only wish they would get going here and put this current crowd of buffoons at the ANC out of . .more

by ER on February 24 2010, 13:18
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

What do we whiteys need, ER?
I'm curious. What exactly do we whiteys need that we haven't got? From where I sit the ONLY thing we don't have is political control. We control the best schools and universities, the boards of the top companies, the mining houses, the media..you . .more

by Chucky on February 24 2010, 14:12
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

They have been living of the fat of the world
They have been living on the borrowings of the world rather than raising taxes. Money that should and could have been used better where it came from. Now they are starting to pay there own way like the rest of us. This is just the beginning, once . .more

by Lynne on February 24 2010, 21:32
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Sara Palin and the Tea Party Movement?
Thought you would allude to the potential role of Sarah Palin in the Tea Party Movement.

by Derick on February 24 2010, 23:53
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Tea-time
These salt-of-the-earth fiscal conservatives never raised a squeak when their poster-boy president, Geo Bush ran up the largest USA budget deficits ever. They also never complained when the mortgage loans on their houses were bundled into the . .more

by Theseus on February 25 2010, 00:05
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

@ Theseus
The "toxic debt" mortgages date from the last few months of the Clinton era.

by Margaret on February 25 2010, 00:27
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

TEA Party
Don`t confuse issues.TEA(Tax Enough Already) Party is a legitimate civic organization protesting against looting of people hard earned money in the form of inflated taxation.We need such movements in South Africa to protest against Politicians . .more

by Edward Mudau on February 25 2010, 00:52
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

TPM lets get going in SA
I agree with Edward lets get a similar movement going in SA! As a start can we not a taxpayers and citizens demand to see which of our politicians have their taxes up-to date? Lets demand a list from SARS to be published of all MP's and other . .more

by Peterw on February 25 2010, 01:15
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Too good for too long
Americans are starting to revolt, yes, but what few realise is that it is a backlash against hard times. They have had it too good for way too long - low interest rates, lax lending, low goods costs, tax breaks. The first signs of problems started . .more

by positronia on February 25 2010, 01:29
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

T E A Party
We may just end up imbibing (in a little tea party) ourselves shortly.
Municipalities DO NOT DELIVER. Roads, water reticulation, sewage, general City maintainance is not done = WE HAVE NO MONEY!

National Government is doing no . .more

by Taffy Dee on February 25 2010, 01:46
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

@Chucky
We whiteys need the same things as the blackeys. Service delivery, transparent accountable government, a fully functioning justice department ... need I continue?

by Ambrose Bierce on February 25 2010, 01:58
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Must be the Obama Trillions
Last time I looked, Obama had pushed the deficit up to over a $Trillion from GW's already staggering $221Billion, a fact Felicity conveniently forgot to mention.

Dunno about you, but a $Trillion in deficit would upset me...

by Julian on February 25 2010, 02:43
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

@Chucky
What do we need? Sustainability! A fully functioning infrastructure was delivered in 1990 to the ANC. How would you describe the current state of our infrastructure? Hope this helps, dear Chucky.

by ER's mate on February 25 2010, 02:56
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

why no mention of MASSIVE problems
To ascribe only the far right involvement (as you do in this article) in the TEA party is really sloppy. The TEA party stands for Taxed Enough Already.. This is the central theme of the movement and it lays blame at both the Bush and Obama . .more

by lefty article on February 25 2010, 03:00
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Felicity, this kind of cut-and-paste job
and your preference for faux melodrama does not justify your conclusion about the potential for violence. I thought you were supposed to be (Ful)bright? You write as though no one else has access to the same web as you.

You'd display . .more

by Wingnut Winder on February 25 2010, 07:11
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

@Chucky
What we are asking for is:

More political say based on 25% of the tax payers paying for 75% of the countries bills. (The BEE majority have all the say and the funders for it have relatively little..) This MUST be acknowledged politically, a . .more

by JWise on February 25 2010, 07:27
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

If the USA opened it's doors to all there would be millions who would flock in
And about nil who would flock out. If South Africans could get entry in the USA and take all their money out without the punitive tax then I would think millions would move out. The Malema government is shocking really horrifying. He is the devil.

by Manuel on February 25 2010, 08:24
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

The fouth Force
I thought the Tea Party Movement was a code name for the Black Sash.

by Joko on February 26 2010, 03:44
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Tea Paty No Picnic
The tea party movement has a few problems. Firstly it is politically fragmented with left and right wing attributes. Secondly a black man is President. This means that anything anti government is also anti Obama and thus anti Black or anti . .more

by Reader of tea leaves on February 26 2010, 04:13
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it


Name
Subject
Comment

Similar articles

Blogs

Wealth building

Opportunities in the bad news?

Those who believe that what goes down will come back up may snap up equities at barga...

Across the Atlantic

M&A: The new black

Deals are back in style; what does it mean?

Letters from Zimbabwe

Load shedding

Zimbabwe has had an electricity crisis of major proportions this past week, writes Ca...